| Radical Interpretation and the Permutation Principle |
| Henry Jackman |
| Erkenntnis. v. 44, no. 3: pp. 317-26. |
| Area 1 Philosophy of Language |
| Area 2 Philosophy of Mind |
| Keywords Davidson Interpretation Indeterminacy Charity |
| http://www.yorku.ca/hjackman/papers/rad-int-and-perm.pdf |
| Davidson has claimed that to conclude that reference is inscrutable, one must assume that "If some theory of truth . . . is satisfactory in the light of all relevant evidence . . . then any theory that is generated from the first theory by a permutation will also be satisfactory in the light of all relevant evidence." This paper argues, however, that given that theories of truth are not directly read off the world, but rather serve as parts of larger theories of behavior, this assumption is far from self-evident. A proper understanding of the role truth theories play in theories of interpretation makes the inscrutability of reference much less wide-spread than Davidson suggests, and, as a result, the radical interpretation methodology is much less likely to saddle its defenders with counterintuitive cases of indeterminacy than is commonly supposed. |
This site makes heavy use of CSS and some use of the DOM and JavaScript.
It is strongly recommended that you use a current standards-compliant browser to view it, such as Firefox.
If you are having difficulties with the site, please write the maintainer and include your User Agent string, which is:
CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html)
Have a nice day.
